Qualifying a SOC 2 readiness lead
Most readiness enquiries are not engagements. Nine questions on a thirty minute call sort them, and four specific answers should end the call politely.
A SOC 2 readiness enquiry is worth pursuing when three things are true: a named customer has asked for the report in writing, somebody inside the company owns the work, and the date they have been given is achievable. If any one is missing you are looking at a research project that consumes two proposals and four calls before going quiet. Roughly half of inbound readiness enquiries fail at least one of the three, so the qualification call matters more than the pitch.
3 Conditions that have to hold
30 minutes Enough to know, if you ask in the right order
4 Answers that should end the call
If getting the enquiry is the harder problem, where readiness work comes from covers the channels and what each costs per signed client.
The nine questions, in order
- Who asked you for this, and what did they write? The exact words matter. "SOC 2" means the buyer has not decided either. "SOC 2 Type 2" is a hard constraint on the calendar and rules out any short path. No named requester at all means you are talking to somebody doing internal groundwork.
- What date does the report have to exist by, and where did the date come from? A date from a contract is real. A date from a board deck moves. Work backwards on the call and say out loud whether it holds.
- Who inside the company owns this? A name, and whether that person can change how engineering works. If the answer is a committee, or the office manager, the engagement will stall on decisions nobody is empowered to make.
- What have you already done? Listen for a platform purchased and unused, which is common, and for policies downloaded and never approved, which is more common. Both are information about how they buy.
- How many production environments, and how many clouds? The single biggest driver of your effort, and the fastest way to know whether your standard price applies.
- Do you have a single identity provider? If no, add meaningfully to the estimate and say why on the call. Most prospects have never had anybody explain the cost of not having one.
- Where does customer data live, and do you hold personal information about people in Quebec or health information for a custodian? Two questions that change scope, and two that a US competitor will not ask.
- What is the budget, and has anybody approved it? Ask directly. "We are still working that out" this late in the call means no budget, and it is better to know in minute twenty than after a proposal.
- Who else are you speaking to? Not to compete on price, but to find out whether they are running a real process or collecting quotes to satisfy a procurement rule.
Ask the date question twice
Once early, and once at the end after they have described the state of their controls. The second answer is frequently different: working through questions five to seven is what makes an unrealistic date visible to them. It is also the moment you become the person who told them the truth.
Reading the answers
| Signal | Reads as | Effect on your proposal |
|---|---|---|
| Named enterprise customer, contract language quoted | Real, funded, urgent | Price normally, move fast |
| Investor or board asked for it | Real but soft on date | Price normally, expect a slower decision |
| "We want to be proactive" | No forcing event | Sell the assessment only, or nothing |
| Engineering lead on the call, empowered | Good | Standard engagement |
| Only a founder, deeply involved in everything | Fine under 25 people, a warning above it | Add project management days |
| Platform bought six months ago, barely used | They buy tools instead of doing work | Charge for the habit change, not the tooling |
| Previous consultant, engagement ended early | Ask what happened before quoting | Assessment first, build quoted after |
| Three or more clouds, no identity provider | Genuinely large | Add 30 to 50 percent, or scope down the boundary |
| Deadline inside 90 days for a Type 2 | Impossible as asked | Reframe to Type 1, or decline |
Four answers that should end the call
- "We need a Type 2 report in six weeks"
- There is no version of this that works. The observation window is calendar time. Explain the arithmetic, offer the Type 1 path, and if they insist on the Type 2 date, decline. Somebody else will take it and be blamed when it does not arrive. Send them the timeline page afterwards.
- "Can you also do the audit?"
- Asking once means they do not yet understand what they are buying, which is fine. Asking again after you explain independence means they are shopping for a firm willing to blur it. Neither the engagement nor the report will be worth anything.
- "We just need the policies"
- Sometimes true and a legitimate small sale. More often they intend to adopt a document set and present it as a control environment, and your name ends up attached to the exceptions. Sell the assessment instead and see whether they buy it.
- "What would you charge, roughly, before we discuss scope?"
- Not a disqualifier on its own, but a number given before questions five through seven is one you will regret. Give a published floor and move back to scope. If they will not discuss scope, they are collecting quotes.
What to send after the call
The proposal follows within forty-eight hours, and what goes in it is shorter than what most firms send.
One email, the same day, three paragraphs. What you heard, in their words. What you would do and roughly what it costs. One thing they should do this week whether or not they hire you. The third paragraph is what gets forwarded internally.
If they are not ready, say so and give them the thing that helps. Sending a prospect to a free tool that scores their own controls closes more work six months later than a follow-up cadence does. The readiness scorecard and checklist are both built for that handover.
The case against qualifying hard
If your practice is new and your calendar is empty, take the marginal engagement at a reduced price. You get a reference, a completed audit to point at, and a relationship with whichever CPA firm signs the report. Qualification discipline is what you adopt once you have more enquiries than capacity. Applying it in year one leaves you with a very clean pipeline of nothing.
What does not change with experience is the six-week Type 2. Take the marginal client. Do not take the impossible date.
How long should a qualification call be?
Thirty minutes, and end it on time even when it is going well. A call that runs to ninety minutes has turned into free consulting, and the prospect has received most of the value of an assessment without buying one.
Should I give a price on the first call?
Give a floor, not a quote. "Engagements like this start at $18,000 CAD and depend on how many clouds and identity systems are in scope" filters out unfunded enquiries without committing you before you know the answers.
What if they already bought a compliance platform?
Good, price for it and say so. The platform covers configuration evidence and policy scaffolding, so your work shifts toward the manual controls it cannot do: access review decisions, vendor reviews, the tabletop, the risk assessment and training records. Quoting your standard fee anyway is the fastest way to lose a lead who can see what the tool already does.
How do I handle a lead who wants a fixed fee before scoping?
Sell them the assessment as the fixed-fee product and quote the build from it. That gives them a fixed price today, gives you a paid discovery, and removes the variance that makes a blind fixed fee dangerous. Packaging a readiness offer covers where fixed fee stops being safe.
List your firm
Enquiries that arrive already knowing their size, their date and their score qualify faster. That is what the tools on this site are for.
List your firm